Warren, Mich. (Friday, November 30, 2012) -- Over 18 months ago the
Army's Stryker combat vehicle underwent a game changing transformation
when the Service took lessons learned from theater and incorporated an
improved hull design to protect Soldiers from improvised explosive
devices and roadside mines.
This new underbody design known as a Double V-Hull (DVH) was based on
proven technology similar to that found on the Service's Mine Resistant
Ambush Protected, or MRAP, vehicles which deflects blasts away from the
vehicle and the Soldiers inside. However, the Stryker DVH took the
concept a step further by incorporating enhanced armor, a new
suspension and blast-attenuating seats. This rapid engineering effort
went from conception to production in less than one year and debuted in
Afghanistan in early summer 2011.
As of this month, 673 Stryker DVHs have been produced, of which over
450 have been fielded for Afghanistan. With more than a year and a half
of combat experience there is enough data to declare the Stryker DVH a
resounding success.
"While deployed to Operation Enduring Freedom, the Stryker DVH has seen
enemy fire and come through with outstanding survivability results. The
majority of Soldiers involved in those instances have walked away from
the vehicles, or returned to duty within a short period of time. Not
only has the number of injuries and casualties dropped dramatically, but
the severity of those instances has substantially decreased," said Lt.
Col. Eric Frutchey, the Product Manager for the Stryker Fleet.
While better protecting Soldiers is by far the most important
development of the DVH effort, the improved operational readiness rates
are also an extremely important advancement.
"The Stryker DVH's operational readiness rate has measurably improved to
an average monthly rate of 99 percent; largely due to the upgraded
carrying capacity and robustness of the new 5.5, or 55,000 pound
capacity, suspension," said Frutchey.
The operational readiness rate is a vital statistic to investigate
because it means that 99 percent of the time the Stryker DVH is ready to
roll when called upon by Soldiers in the field. This means not only has
the DVH cut down on Soldier injuries, but that it has done so while
being ready for more combat missions.
The Army is looking to further enhance Soldier safety in Stryker DVHs by
applying an integrated mine roller system to the front of select
Stryker DVHs. By initiating the explosion away from the vehicles they
are attached to, Soldiers within Stryker DVH can gain even greater
protection. Currently, 144 mine rollers and 80 kits for integration onto
Strykers have been delivered in Afghanistan, and more are on the way.
As the Army continues to discuss the proper fleet mix of DVH and
traditional flat bottom Stryker's, the Project Manager of the Stryker
Brigade Combat Team (PM SBCT) has begun a pilot Exchange Program, in
partnership with Anniston Army Depot (ANAD) and General Dynamics Land
Systems (GD), in response to the Army's request for additional DVH
vehicles at a reduced vehicle cost.
"To maximize the use of fiscal resources, the Army started the exchange
program to validate if components from the traditional Stryker flat
bottom hull (FBH) variants could be expeditiously refurbished and
installed on a new, more survivable DVH, at less cost than producing a
new vehicle," said David Dopp, PM SBCT.
The process includes reusing common parts from FBHs, refurbishing them,
and re-using the parts in the new DVH structure. The DVH exchange
vehicles are expected to have all of the same capabilities as new DVH
production vehicles - the DVH exchange vehicles are built on exactly the
same production line as new DVH vehicles.
The exchange program is scheduled to be complete in early 2013. While
further vehicles will have to be completed for the Army to know exact
savings, it is currently estimated that DVH exchange vehicles will cost
40 percent less, when comparing them to a newly constructed DVH version.
The first DVH exchange vehicle is scheduled to be fielded to the force
in December 2012.
By Bill Good, PEO Ground Combat Systems Public Affairs
No comments:
Post a Comment